Do you
believe that love is found by means of reason (fatalistic view)? Or do you
think that it is found by chance? Give me your hypothesis and let's get to the thesis.
I've been trying to analyse from many perspectives what love is or should be. We attempt to idealise the concept of love quite often. When we idealise something we (somehow) ignore the consequences of it. This is the reason why some of us fall in love so quickly, but it is good. The ones who fall in love too fast are the ones who get to know who they are. This way, knowledge is a complement of love. It creates balance between the ideal conceptualisation of love and the real one.
To my mind, love can be found either my means of reason or by means of chance. So I made a list of what I consider love involves. For my analysis i've read some ideas of such philosphers as Plato and Ortega y Gasset, among others.
1. Love as a
path to find your goal
2. Love as a
force of chaos that transforms everything
3. Love as a
metamorphosis
4. Love as a
rational process
5. Love as
an accident
6. Love as a
perfect idealisation of beauty
7. Love as a
sexual act (Ortega)
8. Love as
charm
9. Love as a
mental status of misery in which the conscience will be impoverished and
paralyzed (Ortega)
10. Love as a
naked manifestation of the self
11. Love as an
intimate process to discover one’s self
12. Love is
two-sided: real and imaginary
13. Love as an aesthetic admiration
14. I believe
that love is everything and, at the same time, nothing.
15. Love as a
divine invention that conserves the beauty of nature
16. Love is
harmony.
Finally, love will always involve more than one subject. In other words, there must be at least two people performing love. If there are more than two people the situation changes and we would be talking about Shakespearean love triangular relationships, in which corruption would be a counter part (Thomas Hobbes).
Love is a mixture of the ideal and the real. Things
are more probable than improbable.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario